Purrfect Properties Blog

Archive for February, 2016

How to Make a Diaper Cake into a Huge Success

Friday, February 19th, 2016

I love arts and crafts time; I have loved it since I was a child.  So when I was invited to the Baby Shower for my brother and sister-in-law, I couldn’t have been more happy to create something special and a lasting memory.  There were a few solid reasons why the hubs and I decided to do a diaper cake for Amy and Trevor. First, this is a great way to tie together and present many of the major items you will need as a new parent.  Washcloths galore, hooded towels and diapers, lots and lots of diapers; but, let’s not forget that champagne.  Here are the steps and list of items you will need to make this EPIC, SEA THEMED DIAPER CAKE for your next baby shower!

List of Supplies to create an Epic, Sea Themed Diaper Cake

  • Decorative large tray (Dollarama)
  • 1 Bag Elastic Bands (Dollarama)
  • Safety Pins (Dollarama)
  • Two colors of ribbons (Michaels)
  • Pipecleaners (colors to match squirtie toys)
  • Diapers Newborn, 120 Count
  • 1 Set Hooded Towels – Sea Theme (3 towels in total)
  • 1 Set Squirtie Toys – Sea Party Theme
  • 1 Set Primary Color Washcloths (12 cloths in total)
  • 1 Nuby Icy Teether
  • Champagne or Sparkling Wine Bottle

The Lamaze Octotunes you see in the above photo was the inspiration for this project.  He wanted to share the joy he got by seeing his son play with this toy when Ryan was young.  Each of the legs makes a different tune when you squeeze it and the entire toy smells so wonderful, completely like the baby section.  Even the girls (Sophia and Sailor) kept going over to the toy to smell it’s baby aroma. lol So all the colors of this cake were chosen to go with Mr. Octotunes.

D.I.Y Instructions- How to to create an Epic, Sea Themed Diaper Cake

Let’s start off with all those diapers.  Each needed to rolled, with an elastic put around the center to hold it together.  Try to go with the curve of the diaper rather than against.  I kept all the diapers in their folded state and rolled on from there. The first eight or so go around that champagne bottle to start creating the circle shape of the cake.  Keep putting rolled diapers around the champagne bottle until you fill the entire tray.  Put a big elastic around the first row of diapers surrounding the champagne, then put another elastic (or two if one won’t reach) around the entire circle of diapers.

The hooded towels were wrapped around all the diapers on each of the level to create an “icing look” for each of the levels.  They were not pinned into place but simply tucked under and around the layer of diapers.  I ended up getting a ribbon roll of sturdy, non-wired almost burlap like material, which i sed to tightly wrap around the base of each layer and pin into place to add a structural tightness to each layer.

I chose to do three layers, white, blue and white.

The colorful yellow and blue ribbons were wrapped on top of the burlap ribbon to create another layer of ‘decorative icing’ and safety pinned in the back.  At this point, you may want to straighten the layers out, perform sturdiness tests and reinforce as required to keep you cake in tip-top shape.

This entire time that the cake had been in process, the hubs here; Mike – had been working on the washcloth rosettes.  In the end, we found attaching the rosettes quite a bit more difficult than anticipated, so he started wrapping the rosettes around pipecleaners, so the pipecleaner and washcloth could be held by pressure, after inserting the pipecleaner between the cake layers.  God job honey, that’s a long time to work on baby cloths. lol.

Basically, we also had the same problem with the Squirtie toys when we started to add them, so each of the bath creatures got attached to the cake through pressure-held pipecleaners between the cake layers.  A special bow was added to the top using wired ribbon.

Here’s a look at the almost finished piece.  I went back to the store looking for a ‘life preserver’ to put on the cake.  I ended up finding an icy teether and attached that with ribbon in the front as a focal point.

Here’s the finished piece, Momma and All!

This diaper cake might take you awhile to create and it certainly won’t be cheap.  It will however be loved, a statement piece at a baby shower and a lasting memory for years to come for both you and the giftees.  Now that’s the Cats’ Meow.

Broken Windows: an interesting Theory on Crime in Edmonton.

Tuesday, February 9th, 2016

Hi Folks,

Some of you may have read Malcolms’ book the Tipping Point and you can relate to the lessons we can find within the story.  I like this Theory.  I like that it becomes an expression of how well the community is cared for and how much care the residents show for the community.

There’s a lot of mystery in location.

It can be the honest difference in tens of thousands of dollars of selling price, if not more.  Why is that?  Especially in Condominium Management we see varying degrees of maintenance and enforcement. One condo unit, identical to another and only separated by a few blocks can sell for much more or less than another.  Why is that? The condition of the exterior walkways, the roofing, the tidiness of the area, the way parking is handled; all contribute to the way a property is perceived and therefore directly affect your selling price.

Location, location, location and condition.

We generally experience a better ‘feeling’  or sense of safety in an area with a Home Owners Association and fees for extra maintenance and control in the area.   Restrictions on the type of housing, the number of trees, the parking by-laws, the snow-shovelling tendencies, the removal of waste, the location of lighting, emergency access routes; everything comes together to create one thing: your community.  I believe each of these items and more can be an expression of ‘broken windows’ in properties and communities throughout Alberta.  We are either a part of making it better or making it worse.  We have a choice to help clean it up or to watch it deteriorate.  What kind of neighbour are you? Evolution and organization within a community leading to watchful eyes and a willingness to speak out about fears or undesirable scenarios.  The alternate option?  I guess seeing where the broken windows can take you is a choice…

During the 1990s violent crime declined across the United States for a number of fairly straightforward reasons. The illegal trade in crack cocaine, which had spawned a great deal of violence among gangs and drug dealers, began to decline. The economy’s dramatic recovery meant that many people who might have been lured into crime got legitimate jobs instead, and the general aging of the population meant that there were fewer people in the age range — males between eighteen and twenty-four — that is responsible for the majority of all violence. The question of why crime declined in New York City, however, is a little more complicated. In the period when the New York epidemic tipped down, the city’s economy hadn’t improved. It was still stagnant. In fact, the city’s poorest neighborhoods had just been hit hard by the welfare cuts of the early 1990s. The waning of the crack cocaine epidemic in New York was clearly a factor, but then again, it had been in steady decline well before crime dipped. As for the aging of the population, because of heavy immigration to New York in the 1980s, the city was getting younger in the 1990s, not older. In any case, all of these trends are long-term changes that one would expect to have gradual effects. In New York the decline was anything but gradual. Something else clearly played a role in reversing New York’s crime epidemic.

The most intriguing candidate for that “something else” is called the Broken Windows theory. Broken Windows was the brainchild of the criminologists James Q. Wilson and George Kelling. Wilson and Kelling argued that crime is the inevitable result of disorder. If a window is broken and left unrepaired, people walking by will conclude that no one cares and no one is in charge. Soon, more windows will be broken, and the sense of anarchy will spread from the building to the street on which it faces, sending a signal that anything goes. In a city, relatively minor problems like graffiti, public disorder, and aggressive panhandling, they write, are all the equivalent of broken windows, invitations to more serious crimes:

Muggers and robbers, whether opportunistic or professional, believe they reduce their chances of being caught or even identified if they operate on streets where potential victims are already intimidated by prevailing conditions. If the neighborhood cannot keep a bothersome panhandler from annoying passersby, the thief may reason, it is even less likely to call the police to identify a potential mugger or to interfere if the mugging actually takes place.

This is an epidemic theory of crime. It says that crime is contagious — just as a fashion trend is contagious — that it can start with a broken window and spread to an entire community. The Tipping Point in this epidemic, though, isn’t a particular kind of person. It’s something physical like graffiti. The impetus to engage in a certain kind of behavior is not coming from a certain kind of person but from a feature of the environment.

In the mid-1980s Kelling was hired by the New York Transit Authority as a consultant, and he urged them to put the Broken Windows theory into practice. They obliged, bringing in a new subway director by the name of David Gunn to oversee a multibillion-dollar rebuilding of the subway system. Many subway advocates, at the time, told Gunn not to worry about graffiti, to focus on the larger questions of crime and subway reliability, and it seemed like reasonable advice. Worrying about graffiti at a time when the entire system was close to collapse seems as pointless as scrubbing the decks of the Titanic as it headed toward the icebergs. But Gunn insisted. “The graffiti was symbolic of the collapse of the system,” he says. “When you looked at the process of rebuilding the organization and morale, you had to win the battle against graffiti. Without winning that battle, all the management reforms and physical changes just weren’t going to happen. We were about to put out new trains that were worth about ten million bucks apiece, and unless we did something to protect them, we knew just what would happen. They, would last one day and then they would be vandalized.”

Gunn drew up a new management structure and a precise set of goals and timetables aimed at cleaning the system line by line, train by train. He started with the number seven train that connects Queens to midtown Manhattan, and began experimenting with new techniques to clean off the paint. On stainless-steel cars, solvents were used. On the painted cars, the graffiti were simply painted over. Gunn made it a rule that there should be no retreat, that once a car was “reclaimed” it should never be allowed to be vandalized again. “We were religious about it,” Gunn said. At the end of the number one line in the Bronx, where the trains stop before turning around and going back to Manhattan, Gunn set up a cleaning station. If a car came in with graffiti, the graffiti had to be removed during the changeover, or the car was removed from service. “Dirty” cars, which hadn’t yet been cleansed of graffiti, were never to be mixed with “clean” cars. The idea was to send an unambiguous message to the vandals themselves.

“We had a yard up in Harlem on one hundred thirty-fifth Street where the trains would lay up over night,” Gunn said. “The kids would come the first night and palm the side of the train white. Then they would come the next night, after it was dry, and draw the outline. Then they would come the third night and color it in. It was a three-day job. We knew the kids would be working on one of the dirty trains, and what we would do is wait for them to finish their mural. Then we’d walk over with rollers and paint it over. The kids would be in tears, but we’d just be going up and down, up and down. It was a message to them. If you want to spend three nights of your time vandalizing a train, fine. But it’s never going to see the light of day.”

Gunn’s graffiti cleanup took from 1984 to 1990. At that point, the Transit Authority hired William Bratton to head the transit police, and the second stage of the reclamation of the subway system began. Bratton was, like Gunn, a disciple of Broken Windows. He describes Kelling, in fact, as his intellectual mentor, and so his first step as police chief was as seemingly quixotic as Gunn’s. With felonies — serious crimes — on the subway system at an all-time high, Bratton decided to crack down on farebeating. Why? Because he believed that, like graffiti, farebeating could be a signal, a small expression of disorder that invited much more serious crimes. An estimated 170,000 people a day were entering the system, by one route or another, without paying a token. Some were kids, who simply jumped over the turnstiles. Others would lean backward on the turnstiles and force their way through. And once one or two or three people began cheating the system, other people —who might never otherwise have considered evading the law — would join in, reasoning that if some people weren’t going to pay, they shouldn’t either, and the problem would snowball. The problem was exacerbated by the fact fare-beating was not easy to fight. Because there was only $1.25 at stake, the transit police didn’t feel it was worth their time to pursue it, particularly when there were plenty of more serious crimes happening down on the platform and in the trains.

Bratton is a colorful, charismatic man, a born leader, and he quickly made his presence felt. His wife stayed behind in Boston, so he was free to work long hours, and he would roam the city on the subway at night, getting a sense of what the problems were and how best to fight them. First, he picked stations where fare-beating was the biggest problem, and put as many as ten policemen in plainclothes at the turnstiles. The team would nab fare-beaters one by one, handcuff them, and leave them standing, in a daisy chain, on the platform until they had a “full catch.” The idea was to signal, as publicly as possible, that the transit police were now serious about cracking down on fare-beaters. Previously, police officers had been wary of pursuing fare-beaters because the arrest, the trip to the station house, the filling out of necessary forms, and the waiting for those forms to be processed took an entire day — all for a crime that usually merited no more than a slap on the wrist. Bratton retrofitted a city bus and turned it into a rolling station house, with its own fax machines, phones, holding pen, and fingerprinting facilities. Soon the turnaround time on an arrest was down to an hour. Bratton also insisted that a check be run on all those arrested. Sure enough, one out of seven arrestees had an outstanding warrant for a previous crime, and one out of twenty was carrying a weapon of some sort. Suddenly it wasn’t hard to convince police officers that tackling fare-beating made sense. “for the cops it was a bonanza,” Bratton writes. “Every arrest was like opening a box of Cracker Jack. What kind of toy am I going to get? Got a gun? Got a knife? Got a warrant? Do we have a murderer here? . ..

After a while the bad guys wised up and began to leave their weapons home and pay their fares.” Under Bratton, the number of ejections from subway stations — for drunkenness, or improper behavior — tripled within his first few months in office. Arrests for misdemeanors, for the kind of minor offenses that had gone unnoticed in the past, went up fivefold between 1990 and 1994. Bratton turned the transit police into an organization focused on the smallest infractions, on the details of life underground.

After the election of Rudolph Giuliani as mayor of New York in 1994, Bratton was appointed head of the New York City Police Department, and he applied the same strategies to the city at large. He instructed his officers to crack down on quality-of-life crimes: on the “squeegee men” who came up to drivers at New York City intersections and demanded money for washing car windows, for example, and on all the other above-ground equivalents of turnstile-jumping and graffiti. “Previous police administration had been handcuffed by restrictions,” Bratton says. “We took the handcuffs off. We stepped up enforcement of the laws against public drunkenness and public urination and arrested repeat violators, including those who threw empty bottles on the street or were involved in even relatively minor damage to property…. If you peed in the street, you were going to jail.” When crime began to fall in the city — as quickly and dramatically as it had in the subways — Bratton and Giuliani pointed to the same cause. Minor, seemingly insignificant quality-of-life crimes, they said, were Tipping Points for violent crime.

Broken Windows theory and the Power of Context are one and the same. They are both based on the premise that an epidemic can be reversed, can be tipped, by tinkering with the smallest details of the immediate environment. This is, if you think about it, quite a radical idea.

– From, ‘The Tipping Point’ by Malcolm Gladwell.